Well if Bookchin says smth, I listen. Having said that I still do think the vagueness of deep ecology has value, particularly in the existing political atmosphere.

I feel as if the critique kind of takes us off course from an important discussion, unless there’s a better alternate. (Which there just might)

Perhaps I’m being too defensive but I feel the finger wagging is unnecessary when it comes to the topic by Bookchin. But I’m not very well read regarding the history of this topic.

Gonna go do some research now