If you have a DRM-free stream on a mobile device, you can cast from it.

If you have a DRM-free stream on PC, you can use Sunshine (PC) and Moonlight (webOS App, manual install) to stream PC to webOS. You can use webOS Dev Manager to install on TV from PC. docs

Seeking out legal advice in just one day is quite… minimal.

It must be costing them

From their Terms:

DAB Music Player does not host any copyrighted content. Our Service acts as a search and streaming interface that connects to publicly available APIs. We do not store or distribute copyrighted material.

When you open the Webbrowser Developer Tools, Network tab, you can see where it streams from.

When I check on a song, it streams it from a CDN of qobuz (qobuz.com).

That’s a very ambiguous and loaded question.

They mention deindexing from browse and search. I understand this to mean you can still visit and buy the products, and list the publisher’s titles on their publisher’s page.

That’s far from “banning”. And doesn’t prevent the supporting creators and browsing their catalog - the use-case OP described.

I presume it’s based on their legal cost of the three previous cases.

I agree it’s very low in terms of cost of business, as legal cost, or seeking damages.

They don’t embed the fonts on the website. They render previews as images. You can’t download them from previews. You’ll have to buy to get them according to their terms.

You could have at least transformed the inaccessible video form into text.

It seems like they’re referring to https://github.com/Batlez/ChatGPT-Jailbroken/, where you can check the source code.

To me it looks like all that does is make some kind of placeholder replacement, and there’s some kind of custom prompt storage and retrieval.

Either way, if it does what you expect it to, doing more than intended by the service provider, it only works until they fix some checks or make some UI changes, and they may hold you accountable for evading technical measures to gain more than you subscribed (and paid) for.

Personally, I wouldn’t trust integrating a random third party logic on a registered service. At the very least, I would disable auto-updating or copy/fork it.

I don’t see them claiming it being “safe to download”. I assume you’re taking the implication or assumption as advocation and a safety assessment.

Depending on what you mean by “safe”, no it’s not safe.

I’m not familiar with the ChatGPT service in particular.

Comparison of BitTorrent clients - Wikipedia; qBittorrent, Tixati, BiglyBT, BitComet

cuiiliste.de is an effort (of one person) to make the list and its effects transparent, and inform about how you can switch DNS.

How do they make their service “not available” to a country?

By IP address location? Which, in my understanding, is not accurate.

By terms, stating “you can’t use it if you live there”?