Piefed.social Staff

Community owner of !television@piefed.social and !obscuremusic@piefed.social

  • 0 Posts
  • 8 Comments
Joined 9 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 18th, 2025

help-circle


  • Sorry, but no private profiles please. This isn’t Facebook. Its a public forum. Allowing users to hide their history just encourages trolling, astroturfing and erodes the high trust culture of the fediverse.

    This is also why I suppose public voting, and public modlogs.

    Reddit is notably degraded due to them allowing users to hide their post history now.


    Duplicate communities existing is both good and bad. It means that badly run communities can be redesigned and overtaken on other instances if enough users are angry with how its run. Although, yes, duplication is an issue. Piefed feeds and crossposting mitigates this somewhat.


    The search on fediverse isn’t perfect, but its far better than Reddits useless search tools. I will hear no lectures here.


  • Moderators don’t literally “own” the communities they run now. They steward them. They can power-trip, but they can also be supplanted and replaced much easier on the Fediverse than they are on Reddit.

    As for being able to “ignore” specific community moderators decisions, that’s a recipe that doesn’t scale well. In more active communities, that would mean that you would end up consistently seeing a lot of spam and abuse and nonsense because even a poor moderator will do the janitorial work that all communities do.


    In terms of instances, there simply isn’t any appetite for the type of instances and community culture you want. You are simply in a minority here.


  • Make it pull instead of push. Each user has way too little control over their own experience in my opinion. To me from an old-school-internet background, it’s very weird that a moderator can override what comments you’re allowed to see or not allowed to see. I much prefer Bluesky’s model, where you pick your moderators, and someone can’t override you and decide that certain comments you’re not allowed to read just because those comments happened to land within that person’s little domain after they were the first to claim the “worldnews” name for their community or whatever.

    I feel like we’ve had a debate on this before. This would just negate the concept of communities built up by moderators. Also, in many case, instances have rules before communities. How does that system work here?

    I haven’t looked at how Piefed does “feeds,” but that might be one good approach; let someone create or share a “politics” feed for example, and it can be a modification of someone else’s feed (”!news@lemmy.world but take out the Trump stuff” or “block these specific annoying users” or “ignore decisions by these two moderators"), so that it’s not a monopoly in terms of who gets to curate and control the content. You could subscribe to !betterpolitics@lemmy.world for example, and it’s just the identical posts sourced from !politics@lemmy.world, but with some users that are widely disliked banned, and then also with certain moderators who consistently make bad decisions disabled. That’s a lot harder to implement of course… IDK, this is just me thinking out loud about solutions I could see, but hopefully it makes some kind of sense.

    Feeds are just made and maintained by one person that draw from a pool of selected communities. You can subscribe to a feed or follow new posts made in it. The creator doesn’t curate it beyond curating what communities are visible in it. Piefeds word filters already work to mitigate content users don’t want to see.




  • Skavau@piefed.socialtoLemmy@lemmy.mlBit much ain't it?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think maybe it could be set up that closed communities could be manually hidden from search results, or defunct instances essentially completely delisted. Piefed handles this better because you can directly filter by weekly activity in the community browser.